NINOFF

Network for Integrity in Open Funds

Giving should not end when you press Donate.

NINOFF is exploring a simple standard: charities should be able to show donors clearly how entrusted money was received, reconciled to eligible spending, or remains available for its purpose.

✓ Donor identities stay private✓ Clear accounting language✓ No blockchain gimmicks

Fictional public example

Community Meals Fund

Published
Received£12,450
Reconciled£9,880
Remaining£2,570
Fresh food & ingredients£6,240
Kitchen hire£2,160
Volunteer travel£1,480
Explore the live demonstrator →

A clearer line of sight

From a generous decision to understandable evidence.

NINOFF presents the parts of fund accounting a donor needs, while preserving the distinctions an accountant expects.

01

Money received

A donation is recorded against the relevant fund without publishing donor identity.

02

Purpose retained

Restrictions and fund purpose remain visible as money is pooled.

03

Spending reconciled

Eligible expenditure is allocated to available fund money with supporting context.

04

Balance explained

The public view shows what is accounted for and what remains unspent.

Built for honest answers

Not “your £20 bought this.” Something more credible.

Charity money is often pooled. NINOFF does not invent a one-to-one story between a donation and an invoice. It shows the fund received, eligible expenditure, reconciliation method and money still waiting to be used.

Understand the model

Private donors

Public money flows do not require public names or contact details.

Plain evidence

Dates, categories, balances and suitable supporting records—not marketing fog.

Small-charity focus

A practical way for unfamiliar organisations to earn confidence.

Designed to connect

A future transparency layer over existing donation and accounting tools.

Help test the hypothesis

Would clearer evidence change where you give?

The survey takes about three minutes, requires no account, and does not ask for your name or contact details.

Take the donor survey →